Bernd
06/15/2020 (Mon) 20:01:20
No.37856
del
06/15/2020 (Mon) 20:01:20
No.37856
del
>>37854
Oh the Tökhöly rebellion. That was more liek an occupation. The de jure owner was Leopold.
>Poland-Lithuania
That was a personal union. Báthory as a Polish king wasn't the vassal of the Porte.
>>37855
Well, same as at Thököly.
Tho ofc, it really depends on what we call as "under rule". We could even argue that since the Porte had no say in the internal politics of the princes of Transylvania (it was a tributary state basically, they could pressure them in foreign politics to some extent) they didn't really rule those areas.
Oh the Tökhöly rebellion. That was more liek an occupation. The de jure owner was Leopold.
>Poland-Lithuania
That was a personal union. Báthory as a Polish king wasn't the vassal of the Porte.
>>37855
Well, same as at Thököly.
Tho ofc, it really depends on what we call as "under rule". We could even argue that since the Porte had no say in the internal politics of the princes of Transylvania (it was a tributary state basically, they could pressure them in foreign politics to some extent) they didn't really rule those areas.